DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION
701 S. COURTHOUSE R
OF NAVAL RECORDS
TUR .
Docket No: 608-14
29 January 2015
timely mann
excuse your failure to submit your application-in a
er. . Specifically, YOu provided no reason asa basis
the statute of limitations, As a result, the Board
You-may request reconsideration of
this decision within one year
Board's decision, However, your request
ROBERT. J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0260 14
In May 2007, you requested a reconsideration of that decision. Again, your request was denied on 22 July 2010, based on that fact that no new or material evidence was presented. On 27 September 2013, you have submitted yet another request for reconsideration and you still have not provided any new or material evidence to warrant a change to your record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3842 14
After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided the statement “for the sake of truth” as a reason for waiving the statute of limitations. Sincerely, ROBERT J. O’NEILL Executive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2908 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2015. Specifically, you provided the statement “I need this for insurance purposes,” as the basis for waiving the statute of limitations. The Board determined that the reason you provided was insufficient to waive the statute of limitations and there is no evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your application within the three years...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09029-10
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 29 December 2003, he executed a DD Form 2656 declining participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 01657-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct'and especially...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07773-10
On or about 13 March 2006, you appeared before a Performance Review Board {PRB} convened to inquire into your aptitude and performance. In the Board's view, your request to disenroll was a voluntary decision made of your own free will. Docket No._7773-10 were aware that you could continue in the NROTC program as well.?
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10714-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 16 October 1991 your commanding officer recommended separation by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure because you had refused treatment. In your application, you are requesting that the reason for your discharge be changed.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13160 14
Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROQ6157-14 19 Taswitoass OAT aa A eve This ig in reference to your application for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section 1552. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02264-12
Evidence is considered to be material if it is likely to have a substantial effect on the outcome of the prior Board’s decision. Therefore, you were sent another letter stating that your reconsideration was not appropriate at that time and that it was regretted that the facts and circumstances of your case were such that a more favorable reply cannot be made. You then sent another letter dated 5 September 2012, requesting another reconsideration and you still have not provided any new or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8289 13
Evidence is considered to be material if it is likely to have a substantial effect on the outcome of the prior Board's decision. The Board was not persuaded by the following issues, your counsel presented: 1) that it was unreasonable for Petitioner to respond to an advisory opinion (A/O) by the SBP Manager that was not fully formed, 2) that Petitioner should not have to agree to pay an undetermined amount of money prior to the Board's decision, and 3) that.there is a lack of an opinion from...